Griffin v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that State’s late disclosure of undercover police officer who witnessed narcotics transaction violated appellant’s due process rights and required continuance
• holding that state’s late disclosure of witness required a continuance
• reversing denial of motion for continuance where witness was disclosed on the eve of trial and stating that “[a]de-quate time to prepare a defense is inherent in the right to counsel and is founded on due process principles”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Jones v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-04-07· cited 21×
• Wilson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-06-27· cited 5×
• Smith v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-08-24· cited 2×
• N.C.M. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-12-23

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Brown v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-02-08· cited 54×
• Jones v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1986-02-13· cited 43×
• Smith v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-05-20· cited 32×
• Sumbry v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1975-04-04· cited 19×
• Hutchinson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-05-04· cited 9×
• Beachum v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-08-04· cited 7×
• Lightsey v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1978-11-08· cited 6×
• Hill v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-12-22· cited 4×