Wilson v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding adjudications of delinquency are not \convictions\ for purposes of determining whether a sentence in excess of sentencing guidelines could be justified by an escalating pattern of offenses
• holding adjudications of delinquency are not “convictions” for purposes of determining whether a sentence in excess of sentencing guidelines could be justified by an escalating pattern of offenses
• “We agree with appellant that a juvenile adjudication cannot constitute a prior ‘level 8 or higher’ conviction under section 921.0016(3)(r).” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. J.M.
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2002-07-03· cited 79×
• Martin v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-08-29· cited 7×
• State v. JM
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2002-07-03
• LENIST KEY v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2020-02-12

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Merck v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1995-10-12· cited 37×
• State v. Darrisaw
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1995-09-14· cited 32×
• Grayson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-04-17· cited 10×
• Shook v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-08-03· cited 6×
• Taylor v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-08-23· cited 5×
• Cotton v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-04-07· cited 3×
• Smith v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-12-04· cited 3×
• Davis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-06-25· cited 2×