Skip to main content
· 9/14/1995

State v. Darrisaw

Citations

  • 660 So. 2d 269
  • 1995 WL 541628

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the pattern requirement could be satisfied “either where the offenses are committed in temporal proximity or where there is a similarity of offenses”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harding

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.