Wilson v. Paine

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the defendant must show “there was someone who had the knowledge, the ability and the motivation to bring suit during the period of corporate control”; if no such person exists the corporation was adversely dominated

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Brian Bash v. Textron Financial Corporation
  Sixth Circuit· 2016-08-23· cited 94×
• Alexander v. Sanford
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2014-05-12· cited 37×
• In re Petters Co.
  D. Minnesota· 2013-06-19· cited 16×
• Usacm Liquidating Trust v. Deloitte & Touche, LLP
  D. Nevada· 2011-02-16· cited 7×
• Alan Miller v. Steve N. Miller
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2017-07-13· cited 7×
• Antioch Co. Litigation Trust v. Morgan (In Re Antioch Co.)
  S.D. Ohio· 2011-04-28· cited 2×
• Five Star Lodging, Inc. v. George Construction, LLC
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 2010-08-06· cited 2×
• Colgate v. Disthene Group, Inc.
  Buckingham County Circuit Court· 2013-02-04· cited 2×
• Cindy Alexander, Appellants/cross-resp. v. Gary Sanford, Respondents/cross-app.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2014-05-12
• Davie and Associates Dermatopathology P.A. v. Reditus Laboratories, LLC
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2026-01-07

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Iit, An International Investment Trust v. Bernard Cornfeld
  Second Circuit· 1980-03-17· cited 179×
• Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Receiver of Texas Investment Bank v. Rockleigh S. Dawson, Jr.
  Fifth Circuit· 1993-10-21· cited 169×
• Hecht v. Resolution Trust Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1994-01-11· cited 149×
• Mosesian v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co.
  Ninth Circuit· 1984-03-07· cited 92×
• Drake v. B.F. Goodrich Co.
  Sixth Circuit· 1986-02-05· cited 85×
• Federal Sav. and Loan Ins. Corp. v. Williams
  D. Maryland· 1984-12-05· cited 80×
• Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Howse
  S.D. Texas· 1990-05-04· cited 71×
• Resolution Trust Corp. v. Grant
  Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 1995-06-27· cited 65×
• International Railways of Central America v. United Fruit Company
  Second Circuit· 1967-01-27· cited 63×
• Hackworth v. Hart
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1971-12-17· cited 63×
• Tomlinson v. Siehl
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1970-06-05· cited 62×
• Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Bird
  D. Puerto Rico· 1981-06-16· cited 57×
• Resolution Trust Corp. v. Farmer
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1994-09-16· cited 50×
• FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION v. Carlson
  D. Minnesota· 1988-10-31· cited 46×
• Unnamed case
  Fourth Circuit· 1993-10-15· cited 45×
• Hazel v. General Motors Corp.
  W.D. Kentucky· 1994-09-30· cited 44×
• Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Hudson
  D. Kansas· 1987-11-05· cited 43×
• Saylor v. Lindsley
  S.D. New York· 1969-04-16· cited 43×
• Resolution Trust Corporation v. James M. Artley, Third-Party International Insurance Company, Inc., Third-Party the Cincinnati Company, Third-Party
  Third Circuit· 1994-08-12· cited 36×
• Federal Deposit Insurance v. Smith
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1999-04-22· cited 34×