Mosesian v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dealing with an accountant who allegedly issued false and misleading reports relied upon by stockholders to purchase stock
• “The question of what a reasonably prudent investor should have known is particularly suited to a jury determination.”
• “The question of what a reasonably pru- dent investor should have known is particularly suited to a jury determination.”
• “Congress did not provide a statute of limitations for private actions brought under section 10(b)----The federal courts therefore borrow the forum state’s statute of limitations for fraud actions.”
• “The question of what a reasonably pru- BETZ v. TRAINER WORTHAM & CO. 13477 dent investor should have known is particularly suited to a jury determination.”
• adverse domination applied to accountant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

71 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Demoulas v. Demoulas Super Markets, Inc.
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1997-03-13· cited 394×
• Landes Construction Co., Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Royal Bank of Canada, Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee
  Ninth Circuit· 1987-12-09· cited 282×
• Livid Holdings Ltd. v. Salomon Smith Barney, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2005-04-06· cited 248×
• Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Receiver of Texas Investment Bank v. Rockleigh S. Dawson, Jr.
  Fifth Circuit· 1993-10-21· cited 169×
• Robert Eckstein v. Balcor Film Investors
  Seventh Circuit· 1993-08-20· cited 160×
• Livid Holdings Ltd v. Salomon Smith Barney, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2005-08-02· cited 124×
• Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,497 John D. Marks v. Cdw Computer Centers, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, F/k/a Mpk Computing, Inc., and Michael P. Krasny
  Seventh Circuit· 1997-07-28· cited 94×
• Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Howse
  S.D. Texas· 1990-05-04· cited 71×
• Betz v. Trainer Wortham & Co., Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2007-10-04· cited 70×
• In Re WorldCom, Inc. Securities Litigation
  S.D. New York· 2004-12-15· cited 62×
• Bemis v. Estate of Bemis
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1998-11-25· cited 60×
• Gray v. First Winthrop Corp.
  Ninth Circuit· 1996-05-02· cited 55×
• Resolution Trust Corp. v. Farmer
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1994-09-16· cited 50×
• Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,816 General Builders Supply Company v. River Hill Coal Venture
  First Circuit· 1986-07-03· cited 47×
• Lubin v. Sybedon Corp.
  S.D. California· 1988-06-22· cited 37×
• Alexander v. Sanford
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2014-05-12· cited 37×
• Lilley v. Charren
  N.D. California· 1996-02-23· cited 33×
• Gruber v. Price Waterhouse
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1988-08-26· cited 33×
• Hill v. Equitable Bank
  D. Delaware· 1987-03-02· cited 31×
• Freedman v. Louisiana-Pacific Corp.
  D. Oregon· 1996-02-14· cited 31×