FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION v. Carlson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting defendants’ authorities unrelated to FDIC action against directors of failed banks
• stat- ing that underlying rationale for adverse domination doctrine is a belief that while in control of a bank, the directors and officers can effectively disguise any wrongdoing
• adopting adverse dominations as consistent with the state discovery rule
• striking defense of comparative fault

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).