Seventh Circuit· 6/18/1996
Wilson v. Kelkhoff
Citations
- 86 F.3d 1438
- 35 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1062
- 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 14826
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- granting absolute immunity to members of a prison review board who revoked a plaintiff’s release after a hearing
- absolute immunity proper for \activities that are inexorably connected with the execution of parole revocation procedures and are analogous to judicial action\
- absolute immunity for members of parole board when they “grant, deny, or revoke parole,” quoting Walrath v. United States, 35 F.3d 277, 281 (7th Cir. 1994)
- probation officer's decision to file violation report and notice of charges is not adjudicative if it does not require independent decision-making
- absolute immunity protects against both actual decision making and any act that is “part and parcel” of the decision making process
- absolute immunity protects against both actual decision making and any act that is “part and parcel” of the decision making process
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Edward Tobey v. Brenda ChibucosSeventh Circuit· 2018-05-15· cited 627×
- Scotto v. AlmenasSecond Circuit· 1998-05-05· cited 503×
- Norwood v. VanceNinth Circuit· 2009-07-09· cited 147×
- James Brunson v. Scott MurraySeventh Circuit· 2016-12-13· cited 135×
- McKnight v. MiddletonE.D. New York· 2010-03-29· cited 108×
- Raymond Heyde v. Gary PittengerSeventh Circuit· 2011-01-11· cited 82×
- Davis v. StateNebraska Supreme Court· 2017-10-06· cited 55×
- United States v. Michael CosciaSeventh Circuit· 2017-08-07· cited 51×
- Saint-Guillen v. United StatesE.D. New York· 2009-09-28· cited 21×
- Dallin Fort v. State of WashingtonNinth Circuit· 2022-07-26· cited 20×
- Curry v. CastilloNinth Circuit· 2002-09-06· cited 11×
- DeSilva v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2004-09-07· cited 10×
- Borzych v. FrankW.D. Wisconsin· 2004-10-14· cited 7×
- Asquith v. Volunteers of AmericaD. New Jersey· 1998-03-20· cited 7×
- Tobin for Governor v. Illinois State Board of ElectionsSeventh Circuit· 2001-10-05· cited 6×
- Koutnik v. BrownW.D. Wisconsin· 2004-12-30· cited 5×
- Omar Gay v. Amy ParsonsNinth Circuit· 2023-03-13· cited 4×
- Doyle v. Camelot Care Centers, Inc.N.D. Illinois· 2001-03-30· cited 2×
- Dawson, Lance v. Newman, ThomasSeventh Circuit· 2005-08-18· cited 1×
- Norwood v. VanceNinth Circuit· 2010-01-07
Cites
28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court· 1982-06-24· cited 22,846×
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court· 1995-06-19· cited 9,097×
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court· 1985-06-19· cited 8,858×
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court· 1973-05-14· cited 5,755×
- Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court· 1978-06-29· cited 3,397×
- Siegert v. GilleySupreme Court· 1991-05-23· cited 2,725×
- Buckley v. FitzsimmonsSupreme Court· 1993-06-24· cited 2,450×
- Forrester v. WhiteSupreme Court· 1988-01-12· cited 2,252×
- Burns v. ReedSupreme Court· 1991-05-30· cited 1,988×
- Cleavinger v. SaxnerSupreme Court· 1985-12-10· cited 1,070×
- Board of Pardons v. AllenSupreme Court· 1987-06-09· cited 775×
- Antoine v. Byers & Anderson, Inc.Supreme Court· 1993-06-07· cited 543×
- Maynard v. City of San JoseNinth Circuit· 1994-10-13· cited 206×
- Clarence C. Trotter v. Paul J. Klincar, Individually and as Acting Chairman of the Prison Review BoardSeventh Circuit· 1984-11-27· cited 135×
- Thompson v. DukeSeventh Circuit· 1989-08-14· cited 105×
- Chester Russ v. Paul Uppah, Rod Cozzetto, and John R. EnrightTenth Circuit· 1992-07-29· cited 96×
- Maltby v. WinstonSeventh Circuit· 1994-09-14· cited 92×
- Wilson v. KelkhoffSeventh Circuit· 1996-06-18· cited 83×
- Charles G. Erff v. Markhon Industries, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 1986-01-16· cited 70×
- Downey v. CommissionerSupreme Court· 1995-06-19· cited 70×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.