Antoine v. Byers & Anderson, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \the lynchpin of both the judicial and quasi-judicial immunities\ is that the acts in question are\an integral part of the judicial process\
• recognizing that the “touchstone” for judicial immunity has been the “performance of the function of resolving disputes between parties, or of authoritatively adjudicating private rights.” (quotation omitted)
• holding that the failure of a court reporter to produce a trial transcript in timely fashion was covered by qualified, not absolute immunity
• holding that “a trustee in bankruptcy . . . is entitled to derived judicial immunity because he is performing an integral part of the judicial process”
• holding that court reporters are afforded no discretion in transcribing court proceedings and therefore are not entitled to judicial immunity for failing to produce transcripts in timely fashion
• holding that court reporters are afforded no discretion in transcribing court proceedings and therefore are not entitled to judicial immunity for failing to produce transcripts in timely fashion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).