Skip to main content

Wilson v. Isaacs

Citations

  • 929 N.E.2d 200
  • 2010 Ind. LEXIS 406
  • 2010 WL 2571863

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the law enforcement immunity of the ITCA does not shield the government from liability for excessive force by police
  • explaining that “[i]f an officer uses unnecessary or excessive force, the officer may commit the torts of assault and battery”
  • finding that the Indiana Tort Claims Act’s law enforcement immunity did not apply to the torts of assault and battery “[i]f an officer uses unnecessary or excessive force . . . .”
  • “If an officer uses unnecessary or excessive force, the officer may commit the torts of assault and battery.”
  • \[T]he statutory provision [concerning the reasonable use of force] restrains the statutory immunity from erecting a shield to liability for conduct contrary to the [use of force] statute.\
  • \[T]he statutory provision [concerning the reasonable use of force] restrains the statutory immunity from erecting a shield to liability for conduct contrary to the [use of force] statute.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dickson, Sullivan, Boehm, Rucker, Shepard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Wilson v. Isaacs

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.