Fidler v. City of Indianapolis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the officers were immune under the Indiana Code § 34-13-3-5(b) but that the plaintiff “may still pursue his state tort claims against the City of Indianapolis stemming from the defendants’ alleged use of excessive force in apprehending and arresting him”
• explaining that federal courts applying Indiana law “consistently decline[] to find an implied right of action for damages under the Indiana Constitution because no such right has yet been recognized by Indiana courts”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).