John Kader v. State of Indiana, Department of Correction, and The Geo Group, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding affidavit submitted by plaintiff should not have been stricken because it was based on the personal knowledge of the affiant and stated facts which would be admissible in evidence
• noting that \summary judgment procedure in Indiana differs significantly from the federal procedure\ where Indiana procedure requires the movant to \designate sufficient evidence to foreclose the nonmovant's reasonable inferences and eliminate any genuine factual issues\
• private prison not subject to ITCA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).