Skip to main content

Wilson v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 301 S.E.2d 1
  • 225 Va. 33
  • 1983 Va. LEXIS 189

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “a presumption is not unconstitutional if, as applied in this case, there was a rational connection between the proved and presumed facts”
  • where the defendants first raised the issue of a prior encounter with the game warden, they \will not be heard to complain when the Commonwealth pursued the matter further to complete the inquiry\
  • where the defendants first raised the issue of a prior encounter with the game warden, they “will not be heard to complain when the Commonwealth pursued the matter further to complete the inquiry”
  • “[O]ur general rule is to give rebuttable presumptions permissive or burden-of-production-shifting effect only.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carrico, Cochran, Poff, Compton, Thompson, Stephenson, Russell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.