Supreme Court· 3/1/1965
United States v. Gainey
Citations
- 380 U.S. 63
- 85 S. Ct. 754
- 13 L. Ed. 2d 658
- 1965 U.S. LEXIS 1733
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that the rationality of an inference must be viewed in the context of the substantive offense it supports
- observing that the rationality of an inference must be viewed in the context of the substantive offense it supports
- upholding statutory provisions authorizing inference of guilt of substantive offenses from unexplained presence at site of illegal activity
- upholding statutory provisions authorizing inference of guilt of substantive offenses from unexplained presence at site of illegal activity
- sustaining a presumption allowing a jury to infer from presence at an illegal still that defendant was \carrying on\ the business of a distiller
- sustaining a presumption allowing a jury to infer from presence at an illegal still that defendant was \carrying on\ the business of a distiller
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stewart, Douglas, Black
Read full opinion on CourtListenerOther cases named United States v. Gainey
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.