Supreme Court· 3/1/1965

United States v. Gainey

Citations

380 U.S. 63
85 S. Ct. 754
13 L. Ed. 2d 658
1965 U.S. LEXIS 1733

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

observing that the rationality of an inference must be viewed in the context of the substantive offense it supports
observing that the rationality of an inference must be viewed in the context of the substantive offense it supports
upholding statutory provisions authorizing inference of guilt of substantive offenses from unexplained presence at site of illegal activity
upholding statutory provisions authorizing inference of guilt of substantive offenses from unexplained presence at site of illegal activity
sustaining a presumption allowing a jury to infer from presence at an illegal still that defendant was \carrying on\ the business of a distiller
sustaining a presumption allowing a jury to infer from presence at an illegal still that defendant was \carrying on\ the business of a distiller

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stewart, Douglas, Black

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

373 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named United States v. Gainey

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.