Skip to main content

Crenshaw v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 219 Va. 38
  • 17 A.L.R. 4th 1328
  • 245 S.E.2d 243
  • 1978 Va. LEXIS 157

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a presumption was unconstitutional when it explicitly provided that the Commonwealth “need not prove” a relevant fact and therefore “exclude[d] from consideration any evidence” regarding that fact

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carrico

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.