Missouri Court of Appeals· 7/20/2010

Wills v. State

Citations

321 S.W.3d 375
2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 974
2010 WL 2812753

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding movant’s inability to demonstrate prejudice from absence of evidence pertaining to his mental health at sentencing hearing dispositive where the motion court—also the sentencing court—determined that 13 movant’s sentence would not have changed
under Missouri law, claims included in a pro se motion for post-conviction relief but not in a subsequent amended motion were “not properly before the motion court because they were a nullity”
under Missouri law, claims included in a pro se motion for post-conviction relief but not in a subsequent amended motion were “not properly before the motion court because they were a nullity”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Howard, Newton, Witt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.