District Court of Appeal of Florida· 6/4/2003
Montano v. State
Citations
- 846 So. 2d 677
- 2003 WL 21276029
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding tape recorded statement given to police shortly after criminal incident was inadmissible under section 90.803(5
- holding tape recorded statement given to police shortly after criminal incident was inadmissible under section 90.803(5
- holding a sworn, taped statement given to a deputy was improperly admitted because the witness herself did not acknowledge its accuracy at trial or that she was truthful at the time she made it
- witness’s tape-recorded statement given to police shortly after criminal incident was improperly admitted under recorded recollection exception to hearsay rule where witness did not acknowledge its accuracy at trial
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gross
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-05-28· cited 23×
- Polite v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2013-06-06· cited 17×
- Polite v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-07-16· cited 11×
- State v. StoneSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2010-06-30· cited 11×
- Hernandez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-03-17· cited 10×
- Blandenburg v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-11-05· cited 10×
- Bartholomew v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-10-31· cited 7×
- Faust v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-08-15· cited 4×
- McNeal v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-02-28· cited 3×
- Aldrin Gomez-Martinez v. the State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2025-06-11
- David Sasser v. Joleen SasserDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2026-06-19
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Henyard v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1996-12-19· cited 101×
- Mitchell v. ArchibaldCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 1998-01-28· cited 99×
- State v. JanoSupreme Court of Florida· 1988-05-05· cited 76×
- Garrett v. Morris Kirschman & Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida· 1976-06-09· cited 57×
- Stoll v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2000-04-06· cited 54×
- Volusia County Bank v. BigelowSupreme Court of Florida· 1903-01-15· cited 41×
- Middleton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1982-12-22· cited 33×
- Gomien v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1965-02-26· cited 30×
- State v. MarcySupreme Court of Vermont· 1996-03-22· cited 27×
- Cotton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-06-09· cited 26×
- Parnell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1969-02-04· cited 20×
- Commonwealth v. NolanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1998-06-01· cited 20×
- Lindley v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama· 1998-11-20· cited 19×
- Montgomery Ward & Co. v. RosenquistDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1959-05-22· cited 11×
- United States v. Donald Lee Sollars, United States of America v. Richard MarzulloEighth Circuit· 1992-11-09· cited 10×
- Kimbrough v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-03-12· cited 9×
- Ringgold v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1976-12-29· cited 8×
- Willis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-12-30· cited 7×
- State v. SkolarDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-05-02· cited 5×
- Kimbrough v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-05-28· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.