Willie Carter v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that denial on grounds of procedural default constitutes a disposition on the merits and thus renders a subsequent § 2254 petition “second or successive” for purposes of the AEDPA
• holding that \a denial on grounds of procedural default constitutes a disposition on the merits and thus renders a subsequent § 2254 petition . . . 'second or successive' for purposes of the AEDPA.\
• concluding that “a denial on grounds of procedural default constitutes a disposition on the merits and thus renders a subsequent § 2254 petition or § 2255 motion ‘second or successive’ for purposes of the AEDPA,” and joining other circuit courts reaching the same conclusion
• clarifying that “the denial of an initial § 2255 motion on grounds of procedural default (i.e., for failure to raise a claim on direct appeal, which failure is not excused by a showing of cause and prejudice
• joining other circuit courts of appeals in holding that “a denial on grounds of procedural default constitutes a disposition on the merits and thus renders a subsequent § 2254 petition or § 2255 motion ‘second or successive’ for purposes of the AEDPA”
• joining other circuit courts of appeals in holding that “a denial on grounds of procedural default constitutes a disposition on the merits and thus renders a subsequent § 2254 petition or § 2255 motion ‘second or successive’ for purposes of the AEDPA”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).