Lewis Altman, Jr., Applicant v. Daniel J. Benik, Warden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a prior untimely petition counts for § 2244(b) purposes because “a statute of limitations bar is not a curable technical or procedural deficiency but rather operates as an irremediable defect (ii
• holding that a prior untimely petition counts for § 2244(b) purposes because “a statute of limitations bar is not a curable technical or procedural deficiency but rather operates as an irremediable defect barring consideration of the petitioner's substantive claims”
• holding that a prior untimely petition counts for § 2244(b) purposes because “a statute of limitations bar is not a curable technical or procedural deficiency but rather operates as an irremediable defect barring consideration of the petitioner’s substantive claims”
• holding that a prior untimely petition counts for § 2244(b) purposes because “a statute of limitations bar is not a curable technical or procedural deficiency but rather operates as an irremediable defect barring consideration of the petitioner’s substantive claims”
• holding an untimely habeas petition qualifies for purposes of Section 2244(b)
• finding dismissal of initial § 2254 petition as untimely renders subsequent § 2254 petition “second or successive” pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).