Second Circuit· 2/7/1997
Kim Chambers v. United States
Citations
- 106 F.3d 472
- 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 2028
- 1997 WL 47692
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that § 2255 is the proper vehicle to challenge the imposition of a sentence
- holding that challenges to the Bureau of Prisons’ execution of sentence is properly brought in a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to Section 2241
- holding that challenges to the Bureau of Prisons’ execution of sentence is properly brought in a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to Section 2241
- holding that where a § 2255 motion follows a § 2241 petition, it is not a second or successive petition if the prior petition sought relief available only under § 2241
- recognizing Section 2241 as the vehicle for challenges to the “computation of a prisoner’s sentence by prison officials”
- barring as a second § 2241 petition a repetitive challenge to application of time credits in the administrative calculation of a federal sentence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cardamone, Winter, Cabranes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
67 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Woodall v. Federal Bureau of PrisonsThird Circuit· 2005-12-15· cited 521×
- Carlos Pelaez-Edison Carmona v. United States Bureau of PrisonsSecond Circuit· 2001-10-25· cited 443×
- Ben Gary Triestman v. United StatesSecond Circuit· 1997-08-28· cited 371×
- Benito Jiminian, - V- John Nash, Warden Fci Ray BrookSecond Circuit· 2001-04-02· cited 325×
- United States v. BarrettFirst Circuit· 1999-05-27· cited 264×
- Alonzo Cook v. New York State Division of Parole, and New York State Board of ParoleSecond Circuit· 2003-02-25· cited 226×
- Eric Adams v. United StatesSecond Circuit· 1998-08-20· cited 181×
- Kulvir Singh Barapind v. Janet Reno, Attorney GeneralNinth Circuit· 2000-08-28· cited 180×
- Elliott Levine v. Craig ApkerSecond Circuit· 2006-07-10· cited 163×
- Queen v. MinerThird Circuit· 2008-06-25· cited 152×
- Thompson v. ChoinskiSecond Circuit· 2008-05-08· cited 145×
- Ronnie James v. James Walsh, Superintendent of Ulster Correctional FacilitySecond Circuit· 2002-10-15· cited 138×
- Eric Adams v. United StatesSecond Circuit· 2004-06-16· cited 109×
- In Re Edward Hanserd, MovantSixth Circuit· 1997-08-25· cited 108×
- Jeremy Pinson v. Michael CarvajalNinth Circuit· 2023-06-08· cited 105×
- Joseph Corrao v. United StatesSecond Circuit· 1998-08-10· cited 98×
- Ralph McIver v. United StatesEleventh Circuit· 2002-09-30· cited 94×
- Billy Ray Littlejohn v. Christopher ArtuzSecond Circuit· 2001-11-14· cited 93×
- Melvin Poindexter v. John Nash, WardenSecond Circuit· 2003-06-26· cited 84×
- Cecil Simon, A.K.A. Cecil Jackson v. United StatesSecond Circuit· 2004-02-19· cited 79×
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1995-12-06· cited 3,526×
- McCleskey v. ZantSupreme Court· 1991-04-16· cited 3,331×
- Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1962-02-26· cited 2,416×
- Felker v. TurpinSupreme Court· 1996-06-28· cited 1,437×
- Miguel Dejesus Liriano v. United StatesSecond Circuit· 1996-10-07· cited 278×
- Robert Camarano v. Frank Irvin, Superintendent, Wende Correctional FacilitySecond Circuit· 1996-10-22· cited 97×
- Carlos Cabrera v. United StatesSecond Circuit· 1992-08-04· cited 66×
- United States v. WerberSecond Circuit· 1995-03-29· cited 54×
- United States v. Walter WeathersbyFifth Circuit· 1992-03-27· cited 51×
- Chambers v. HollandM.D. Pennsylvania· 1996-04-04· cited 45×
- Robert Thomas Neary v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 1993-07-06· cited 28×
- John Dioguardi v. United StatesSecond Circuit· 1978-11-15· cited 24×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.