Kim Chambers v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that § 2255 is the proper vehicle to challenge the imposition of a sentence
• holding that challenges to the Bureau of Prisons’ execution of sentence is properly brought in a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to Section 2241
• holding that challenges to the Bureau of Prisons’ execution of sentence is properly brought in a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to Section 2241
• holding that where a § 2255 motion follows a § 2241 petition, it is not a second or successive petition if the prior petition sought relief available only under § 2241
• recognizing Section 2241 as the vehicle for challenges to the “computation of a prisoner’s sentence by prison officials”
• barring as a second § 2241 petition a repetitive challenge to application of time credits in the administrative calculation of a federal sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).