Skip to main content

Williams v. Williams

Citations

  • 252 P.3d 998
  • 2011 Alas. LEXIS 38
  • 2011 WL 2150549

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding pro se party waived arguments that were not discernable, were made too briefly, or appeared absent meaningful context
  • denying review of issues raised in self- represented litigant’s motions that post-dated judgment identified in notice
  • finding no judicial bias when no evidence that judge “behaved improperly” or made rulings unsupported by record
  • noting party “cannot rely solely on the court’s adverse rulings as evidence of bias” and “must point to specific words or actions showing the court was partial”
  • “Forming an opinion from available evidence does not constitute personal bias.”
  • “Other than a Civil Rule 77(k) motion for reconsideration, which must be made within ten days of the court’s order, an Alaska Civil Rule 60(b

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carpeneti, Fabe, Winfree, Christen, Stowers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.