Skip to main content

Williams v. Williams

Citations

  • 613 A.2d 200
  • 158 Vt. 574
  • 1992 Vt. LEXIS 75

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that trial court’s discretion in awarding marital home is “broad,” and may factor in all of the statutory criteria, including the parties’ respective contributions
  • concluding that the court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to hold hearing where issues father sought to raise in his post-trial motions had been addressed at trial
  • concluding that trial court did not abuse discretion in awarding marital home to wife even while acknowledging husband’s greater financial contributions, considering other factors such as parties’ income, value of other marital assets, and wife’s homemaker contributions
  • holding there was no abuse of discretion in denying defendant’s post-trial motions without a hearing where defendant sought to raise issues already presented at trial
  • explaining that appeals from magistrate decisions are to family division, not Supreme Court
  • affirming family court’s award of marital home to wife, even though husband had contributed more to value of residence, where court balanced that fact against source and income of parties, need of parties, and nonmonetary contribution of wife as homemaker

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Allen, Gibson, Dooley, Morse, Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.