Supreme Court of Vermont· 12/21/1990
Scott v. Scott
Citations
- 586 A.2d 1140
- 155 Vt. 465
- 1990 Vt. LEXIS 260
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that consideration of only single 15 V.S.A. § 751(b) factor in distributing asset, absent broader analysis, would constitute abuse of discretion
- upholding award of spousal maintenance to wife based, in part, on income that husband was “capable” of earning and “imputed” rental income
- upholding court’s decision to award marital home to wife despite both parties’ contributions to mortgages and improvements over course of long marriage as within its “wide discretion”
- trial court's distribution of marital property will not be disturbed on appeal unless discretion was abused, withheld or exercised on untenable grounds
- trial court’s distribution of marital property will not be disturbed on appeal unless discretion was abused, withheld or exercised on untenable grounds
- permissible to consider previous wage statements and previous summer's earnings to predict earning capability in future
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Allen, Gibson, Dooley, Morse, Peck
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- DeLeonardis v. PageSupreme Court of Vermont· 2010-06-04· cited 32×
- Chilkott v. ChilkottSupreme Court of Vermont· 1992-03-20· cited 31×
- Sumner v. SumnerSupreme Court of Vermont· 2004-05-07· cited 24×
- Kohut v. KohutSupreme Court of Vermont· 1995-07-21· cited 23×
- Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Vermont· 1992-06-26· cited 19×
- Justis v. RistSupreme Court of Vermont· 1992-09-18· cited 15×
- LeBlanc v. LeBlancSupreme Court of Vermont· 2014-06-27· cited 13×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Lalumiere v. LalumiereSupreme Court of Vermont· 1988-03-18· cited 35×
- Downs v. DownsSupreme Court of Vermont· 1990-04-06· cited 29×
- Boyce v. BoyceD.C. Circuit· 1946-01-28· cited 23×
- DeGrace v. DeGraceSupreme Court of Vermont· 1986-12-01· cited 21×
- Naumann v. KurzSupreme Court of Vermont· 1989-08-25· cited 20×
- Colm v. ColmSupreme Court of Vermont· 1979-10-02· cited 17×
- Lillis v. LillisCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1964-07-06· cited 16×
- McCrea v. McCreaSupreme Court of Vermont· 1988-07-15· cited 15×
- Burr v. BurrSupreme Court of Vermont· 1987-06-26· cited 13×
- Belanger v. BelangerSupreme Court of Vermont· 1987-06-26· cited 12×
- Heckman v. HeckmanSupreme Court of Delaware· 1968-07-23· cited 11×
- Ellam v. EllamNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1975-01-10· cited 8×
- Buxton v. BuxtonSupreme Court of Vermont· 1987-03-20· cited 6×
- Oxford v. OxfordSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1963-12-16· cited 5×
- Ellis v. EllisSupreme Court of Vermont· 1988-07-21· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.