Supreme Court of Vermont· 12/20/1996
Putnam v. Putnam
Citations
- 689 A.2d 446
- 166 Vt. 108
- 1996 Vt. LEXIS 125
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that court-approved stipulation challenged after attorneys were directed to prepare written order could be set aside only on grounds sufficient to set aside contract
- explaining that counsel for the child is generally not assigned, but that minor's interests are \adequately protected\ by GALs
- explaining that counsel for the child is generally not assigned, but that minor’s interests are “adequately protected” by GALs
- noting in case where trial court had made a finding of collusion on the part of the parents, father failed to show that guardian did not adequately protect child’s interests such that failure to also appoint an attorney was reversible error
- discussing standard for overturning settlement agreements in context of divorce proceedings
- court is justified in setting aside court-approved separation agreement “where the normal boundaries of negotiation and compromise are exceeded”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Allen, Dooley, Morse, Johnson, Mandeville
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Payrits v. PayritsSupreme Court of Vermont· 2000-06-16· cited 50×
- Riehle v. TudhopeSupreme Court of Vermont· 2000-12-13· cited 35×
- Pouech v. PouechSupreme Court of Vermont· 2006-05-12· cited 24×
- Meyer v. MeyerSupreme Court of Vermont· 2001-11-09· cited 22×
- Kellner v. KellnerSupreme Court of Vermont· 2004-01-05· cited 20×
- Rogers v. ParrishSupreme Court of Vermont· 2007-05-04· cited 17×
- Velardo v. OvittSupreme Court of Vermont· 2007-07-27· cited 11×
- Damone v. DamoneSupreme Court of Vermont· 2001-09-14· cited 10×
- Lanoue v. Rutland RenovationsSupreme Court of Vermont· 2008-06-10· cited 2×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1945-02-26· cited 2,668×
- Charles Nagle v. Harry Lee, Sheriff of Jefferson Parish State of Louisiana, Lt. Clifford Montecino, Detective Patricia Laura, Deputy John DoeFifth Circuit· 1987-01-08· cited 98×
- Nickerson v. NickersonSupreme Court of Vermont· 1992-02-07· cited 57×
- Bissonette v. GambrelSupreme Court of Vermont· 1989-06-30· cited 39×
- In Re Burlington Bagel Bakery, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont· 1988-05-13· cited 26×
- Concra Corp. v. AndrusSupreme Court of Vermont· 1982-04-06· cited 21×
- Harris v. HarrisSupreme Court of Vermont· 1994-06-03· cited 20×
- Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Vermont· 1992-06-26· cited 19×
- Burr v. BurrSupreme Court of Vermont· 1987-06-26· cited 13×
- LaFlamme v. ChurchSupreme Court of Vermont· 1983-06-10· cited 6×
- Nurenberg v. CoreySupreme Court of Vermont· 1985-01-18· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.