Skip to main content

Putnam v. Putnam

Citations

  • 689 A.2d 446
  • 166 Vt. 108
  • 1996 Vt. LEXIS 125

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that court-approved stipulation challenged after attorneys were directed to prepare written order could be set aside only on grounds sufficient to set aside contract
  • explaining that counsel for the child is generally not assigned, but that minor's interests are \adequately protected\ by GALs
  • explaining that counsel for the child is generally not assigned, but that minor’s interests are “adequately protected” by GALs
  • noting in case where trial court had made a finding of collusion on the part of the parents, father failed to show that guardian did not adequately protect child’s interests such that failure to also appoint an attorney was reversible error
  • discussing standard for overturning settlement agreements in context of divorce proceedings
  • court is justified in setting aside court-approved separation agreement “where the normal boundaries of negotiation and compromise are exceeded”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Allen, Dooley, Morse, Johnson, Mandeville

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.