District Court of Appeal of Florida· 10/20/1989
Williams v. Williams
Citations
- 550 So. 2d 166
- 1989 WL 123000
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “to show ‘good cause’ for the examination, it must be demonstrated that expert medical testimony is necessary to resolve the issue.”
- mental examination of the husband in a dissolution of marriage case
- claims a father failed to use a car seat for the child, that the child wet his pants after a visit with the father, and that the father used bad language in front of the child and was unstable were insufficient to put the father's mental health in controversy
- claims a father failed to use a car seat for the child, that the child wet his pants after a visit with the father, and that the father used bad language in front of the child and was unstable were insufficient to put the father's mental health in controversy
- claims a father failed to use a car seat for the child, that the child wet his pants after a visit with the father, and that the father used bad language in front of the child and was unstable were insufficient to put the father’s mental health in controversy
- claims a father failed to use a car seat for the child, that the child wet his pants after a visit with the father, and that the father used bad language in front of the child and was unstable were insufficient to put the father’s mental health in controversy
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Threadgill
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Wade v. WadeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-10-23· cited 24×
- In Interest of TMWDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-11-28· cited 17×
- L.D. v. Department of Children & Family ServicesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-03-24· cited 17×
- Schouw v. SchouwDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-02-19· cited 15×
- Russenberger v. RussenbergerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-09-22· cited 8×
- Hastings v. RigsbeeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-06-23· cited 6×
- Dominique v. Yellow Freight System, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-08-24· cited 5×
- Wicky v. OxonianDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-08-07· cited 5×
- Asteberg v. RussellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-08-01· cited 5×
- Nobbe v. NobbeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-11-17· cited 5×
- Oldham v. GreeneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-12-27· cited 4×
- In Re GDDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-03-24· cited 2×
- Reynolds v. Dade County School BoardDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-06-29· cited 1×
- Temares v. TemaresDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-09-02
- Philip P. Oldham v. Hillary E. GreeneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-12-27
- Nataliya Reno v. Richard RenoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-10-03
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Gasparino v. MurphyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1977-12-07· cited 28×
- Fruh v. STATE, DEPT. OF HEALTH & REHAB. SERVICESDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-05-04· cited 14×
- Hicks v. HicksDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-07-17· cited 11×
- In the Interest of S.N. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-05-20· cited 11×
- Kristensen v. KristensenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-11-25· cited 8×
- Paul v. PaulDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-01-30· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.