Skip to main content
· 5/4/1983

Fruh v. STATE, DEPT. OF HEALTH & REHAB. SERVICES

Citations

  • 430 So. 2d 581

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • two requirements of \in controversy\ and \good cause\ not met by mere conclusory allegations in pleadings, nor by mere relevance to case, but require affirmative showing by movant that each condition as to which examination is sought is really and genuinely in controversy
  • mental examination of a father in a dependency action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Frank D. Upchurch, Jr.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.