Wade v. Wade

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a court’s failure to address the “in controversy” element in the written order may be sufficient grounds to overturn the order
• explaining the complete failure to address a requirement “alone may be sufficient to overturn the trial court’s order”
• explaining the complete failure to address a requirement \alone may be sufficient to overturn the trial court's order\
• explaining the complete failure to address a requirement \alone may be sufficient to overturn the trial court's order\
• explaining the complete failure to address a requirement “alone may be sufficient to overturn the trial court’s order”
• “At any hearing on the request for compulsory examination, the party submitting the request has the burden of showing that both the ‘in controversy’ and ‘good cause’ prongs have been satisfied.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Maddox b. Bullard
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-07-07· cited 9×
• Barry v. Barry
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-03-06· cited 8×
• Wade v. Wade
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-10-23· cited 7×
• Manubens v. Manubens
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-08-19· cited 6×
• Asteberg v. Russell
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-08-01· cited 5×
• State, Department of Revenue v. Hartsell
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-04-29· cited 5×
• Todd Andrew Domenico v. Josie Daniel f/k/a Josie Daniel Domenico
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 2024-01-10· cited 5×
• Oldham v. Greene
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-12-27· cited 4×
• Grady Gray v. Gwen E. Richbell and Alan Richbell, etc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-07-09· cited 1×
• Jordan v. Jordan
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-02-29· cited 1×
• Espinosa v. D.H. Griffin Construction Company, LLC
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-04-06· cited 1×
• Medina v. Haddad
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-08-31· cited 1×
• Temares v. Temares
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-09-02
• G.M., THE MOTHER v. DEPT. OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-10-10
• Philip P. Oldham v. Hillary E. Greene
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-12-27
• Nataliya Reno v. Richard Reno
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-10-03
• G.M. v. Dep't of Children & Families
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-10-10

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Schlagenhauf v. Holder
  Supreme Court· 1965-01-18· cited 1,194×
• Schottenstein v. Schottenstein
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-06-17· cited 33×
• Gasparino v. Murphy
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1977-12-07· cited 28×
• Russenberger v. Russenberger
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1994-07-07· cited 18×
• Williams v. Williams
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-10-20· cited 18×
• Fruh v. STATE, DEPT. OF HEALTH & REHAB. SERVICES
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-05-04· cited 14×
• Paul v. Paul
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-01-30· cited 7×
• Doe v. SUNTRUST BANK
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-01-29· cited 3×
• Frisard v. Frisard
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-07-11· cited 2×