Williams v. Williams

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Based upon the testimony regarding the husband’s past earning history and his future earning capacity, we do not believe that the trial court erred in attributing income to the husband in the amount of $4,000 per month.”
• husband challenged paternity testing on direct appeal in dissolution action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hrudka v. Hrudka
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1995-11-21· cited 61×
• In re the Marriage of Lewis
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1991-04-02· cited 45×
• State v. Woody
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1992-07-14· cited 43×
• McAlpine v. McAlpine
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1996-09-05· cited 41×
• In Re the Marriage of Pearson v. Pearson
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1997-09-16· cited 29×
• Moran v. Moran
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1996-08-06· cited 19×
• Marriage of McHale v. McHale
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2005-03-08· cited 17×
• Antonsen v. SUPERIOR COURT IN & FOR CTY OF MARICOPA
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1996-03-12· cited 9×
• State v. Wagner
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1999-04-12· cited 5×
• Garlan v. Garlan
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2020-06-18· cited 5×
• Dysart v. Dysart
  Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands· 2002-12-17· cited 5×
• State v. Castaneda
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2022-09-13