Court of Appeals of Arizona· 11/21/1995

Hrudka v. Hrudka

Citations

919 P.2d 179
186 Ariz. 84
204 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 26
1995 Ariz. App. LEXIS 257

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding that disqualification would be excessive penalty after parties had actively litigated case for year and half before issue of disqualification was raised
trial court may compensate nondissipating spouse when apportioning community property, and governing statute contains no temporal restriction on court’s consideration of dissipation
court may award money to one spouse to compensate for other spouse’s dissipation of community assets
under doctrine of judicial estoppel, \a party who successfully asserts a particular position in one judicial proceeding will not be allowed to assert an inconsistent position in a subsequent proceeding\
“The decision whether to award attorneys’ fees lies within the trial court’s sound discretion.”
“We will not disturb a trial court’s factual findings unless clearly erroneous.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ehrlich, Thompson, Kleinschmidt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.