Hrudka v. Hrudka

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that disqualification would be excessive penalty after parties had actively litigated case for year and half before issue of disqualification was raised
• trial court may compensate nondissipating spouse when apportioning community property, and governing statute contains no temporal restriction on court’s consideration of dissipation
• court may award money to one spouse to compensate for other spouse’s dissipation of community assets
• under doctrine of judicial estoppel, \a party who successfully asserts a particular position in one judicial proceeding will not be allowed to assert an inconsistent position in a subsequent proceeding\
• “The decision whether to award attorneys’ fees lies within the trial court’s sound discretion.”
• “We will not disturb a trial court’s factual findings unless clearly erroneous.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).