Skip to main content
· 1/10/1983

Williams v. WCAU-TV

Citations

  • 555 F. Supp. 198
  • 9 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1073
  • 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20172

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • predicting Pennsylvania will adopt Section 611 of Restatement (Second) Torts formulation and applying that privilege
  • quoting, Miles v. Cmwlth. of PA., 304 A.2d 704, 707 (1973)
  • picture of libel plaintiff under arrest accompanying broadcast about bank robbery does not create implication that plaintiff committed the robbery
  • to establish defense of truth it is not necessary to prove literal truth; sufficient to show substantial truth supporting “gist” or “sting” of alleged defamation
  • “if the statement is true in substance inaccuracies of expression or detail are immaterial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Raymond J. Broderick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.