Harlan E. Orr v. The Argus-Press Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that characterization of a securities law violation as “fraud” was substantially true
• finding no actual malice when defendants published a rational interpretation of ambiguous source material

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).