Skip to main content
· 1/11/1989

ELM Medical Laboratory, Inc. v. RKO General, Inc.

Citations

  • 532 N.E.2d 675
  • 403 Mass. 779

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • abrogated by statute on other grounds, see United Truck Leasing Corp. v. Geltman 406 Mass. 811, 551 N.E.2d 20 (1990)
  • abrogated by statute on other grounds, see United Truck Leasing Corp. v. Geltman 406 Mass. 811, 551 N.E.2d 20 (1990)
  • \The only invasion of privacy the plaintiffs assert is `putting plaintiff[s] in a false light'. This court has not recognized that tort and does not choose to do so now.\
  • “The only invasion of privacy the plaintiffs assert is ‘putting plaintiff[s] in a false light’. This court has not recognized that tort and does not choose to do so now.”
  • “This court has not recognized that tort and does not choose to do so now.”
  • summary judgment award for defendant affirmed where television news station made non-malicious errors in broadcast about limited issue public figure plaintiff

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hennessey, Abrams, Nolan, Lynch, O'Connor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.