· 1/11/1989
ELM Medical Laboratory, Inc. v. RKO General, Inc.
Citations
- 532 N.E.2d 675
- 403 Mass. 779
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- abrogated by statute on other grounds, see United Truck Leasing Corp. v. Geltman 406 Mass. 811, 551 N.E.2d 20 (1990)
- abrogated by statute on other grounds, see United Truck Leasing Corp. v. Geltman 406 Mass. 811, 551 N.E.2d 20 (1990)
- \The only invasion of privacy the plaintiffs assert is `putting plaintiff[s] in a false light'. This court has not recognized that tort and does not choose to do so now.\
- “The only invasion of privacy the plaintiffs assert is ‘putting plaintiff[s] in a false light’. This court has not recognized that tort and does not choose to do so now.”
- “This court has not recognized that tort and does not choose to do so now.”
- summary judgment award for defendant affirmed where television news station made non-malicious errors in broadcast about limited issue public figure plaintiff
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hennessey, Abrams, Nolan, Lynch, O'Connor
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.