District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 10/2/1984
Williams v. United States
Citations
- 483 A.2d 292
- 1984 D.C. App. LEXIS 524
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- remanding with instructions to vacate defendant’s armed burglary conviction because it merged with his first-degree (felony) murder conviction
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: MacK, Pryor, Kern
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Derrington v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1985-02-21· cited 104×
- Nelson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-12-30· cited 98×
- Arnold v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1986-06-18· cited 73×
- Mitchell v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1990-01-26· cited 55×
- Prophet v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-01-31· cited 52×
- Porter v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2003-06-19· cited 43×
- Bowman v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1994-12-30· cited 42×
- Marshall v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-06-26· cited 32×
- Morriss v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1989-02-22· cited 17×
- Void v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1993-09-09· cited 16×
- Portillo v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-06-23· cited 15×
- Washington v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2000-10-05· cited 14×
- Fox v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2011-01-27· cited 13×
- Mason v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2012-10-04· cited 13×
- Lewis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2010-06-24· cited 10×
- Munn v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1997-12-18· cited 8×
- Clements v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1995-12-28· cited 4×
- Hewitt v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2026-02-26
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1946-06-10· cited 7,845×
- Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1960-01-11· cited 2,073×
- Whalen v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1980-04-16· cited 1,789×
- Chiarella v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1980-03-18· cited 1,089×
- Tyrone Gaither v. United States of America, Charles Tatum v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1969-04-24· cited 435×
- Viereck v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1943-03-01· cited 360×
- United States v. Guillermo Novo Sampol, United States of America v. Alvin Ross Diaz, United States of America v. Ignacio Novo SampolD.C. Circuit· 1980-12-09· cited 283×
- Lesly Cohen v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1967-06-20· cited 186×
- United States v. Eric StanchichSecond Circuit· 1977-01-06· cited 135×
- Dyson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1980-07-14· cited 116×
- Beale v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1983-06-20· cited 86×
- Warren v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1981-10-09· cited 85×
- Khaalis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1979-10-22· cited 80×
- Rease v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1979-06-20· cited 71×
- Scott v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1980-03-07· cited 58×
- Hackney v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1978-07-03· cited 56×
- Washington Gas Light Co. v. Public Service CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1982-09-10· cited 55×
- Doepel v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1981-08-13· cited 54×
- Reed v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1982-11-10· cited 53×
- Whalen v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1977-11-10· cited 42×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.