Lesly Cohen v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the use of a Mann instruction “is an invitation to reversal”
• A count of the indictment “was not rendered duplicitous because the bill of particulars and subsequent proof related to a series of calls, even though each might have been 39 alleged as a separate violation.”
• section 1955 defendants need not themselves have gambled
• section 1955 defendants need not themselves have gambled

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).