District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2/22/1989
Morriss v. United States
Citations
- 554 A.2d 784
- 1989 D.C. App. LEXIS 27
- 1989 WL 14150
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding it “just in the circumstances” to reverse conviction for aiding and abetting murder where principals’ convictions were reversed on grounds of trial error
- finding it \just in the circumstances\ to reverse conviction for aiding and abetting murder where principals' convictions were reversed on grounds of trial error
- \... the acquittal of a principal does not preclude conviction of an aider and abettor\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: MacK, Belson, Steadman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Ingram v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-06-21· cited 58×
- Prophet v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-01-31· cited 52×
- United States v. Rayful Edmond, IIID.C. Circuit· 1991-03-28· cited 51×
- Howard v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1995-03-30· cited 44×
- Roy v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1995-01-19· cited 44×
- Kitt v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2006-08-03· cited 39×
- Marshall v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-06-26· cited 32×
- Graham v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1997-12-04· cited 13×
- Reynolds v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-03-14· cited 11×
- In re L.G.T.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1999-08-19· cited 6×
- Spriggs v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2012-09-20· cited 3×
- Perry v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1990-03-14· cited 2×
- In Re LGTDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1999-08-19
Cites
27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1968-06-17· cited 8,792×
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court· 1972-12-06· cited 7,056×
- Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court· 1987-04-21· cited 2,670×
- Fahy v. ConnecticutSupreme Court· 1963-12-02· cited 1,743×
- Nye & Nissen v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1949-05-31· cited 977×
- M. A. P. v. RyanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1971-12-29· cited 973×
- Standefer v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1980-06-09· cited 693×
- United States v. PeoniSecond Circuit· 1938-12-12· cited 651×
- Allen v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1985-07-19· cited 110×
- Hackney v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1978-07-03· cited 56×
- United States v. Sam Tombrello, Jr., Floyd Leon Watson, Jimmy Lee WrightEleventh Circuit· 1982-01-22· cited 54×
- Wagshal v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1966-01-19· cited 54×
- Collazo v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1952-06-02· cited 46×
- Patterson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1978-03-28· cited 42×
- Dorothy M. Gray v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1958-10-27· cited 36×
- United States v. Albert Cox, A/K/A Albert C. SmithD.C. Circuit· 1974-12-18· cited 35×
- Jackson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1978-12-01· cited 34×
- Foster v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1988-10-13· cited 31×
- Williams v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1984-10-02· cited 28×
Other cases named Morriss v. United States
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.