Williams v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that some constitutional errors do not require a new trial if the error was “‘harmless beyond a reasonable doubt’” (quoting Chapman v. California , 386 U.S. 18, 24 (1967)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Jackson v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2000-10-04· cited 114×
• Williams v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2000-02-23· cited 84×
• Underwood v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2000-01-31· cited 60×
• Morgan K. Govan v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2019-01-25· cited 5×
• Herbert Underwood v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2000-01-31

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Chapman v. California
  Supreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
• Arizona v. Fulminante
  Supreme Court· 1991-05-20· cited 6,060×
• Wyrick v. Fields
  Supreme Court· 1982-11-29· cited 424×
• Bivins v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1995-03-09· cited 207×
• Mayberry v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1996-07-19· cited 91×
• Armour v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1985-07-03· cited 50×
• Tompkins v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1996-07-19· cited 32×
• Smith v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1989-09-19· cited 21×
• Leach v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1998-08-21· cited 18×