Supreme Court of Florida· 6/23/1975
Williams v. State
Citations
- 316 So. 2d 267
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that a defendant has the burden of proving manifest injustice and that “[i]n other words, clear prejudice must be shown”
- indicating that a defendant seeking to set aside a plea and sentence has the burden of proving that a “manifest injustice” has occurred
- failure of trial court to establish factual basis for plea in record does not result in plea being set aside unless defendant can prove a manifest injustice
- “The purpose of determining whether a factual basis for a plea exists is to prevent a defendant from mistakenly entering a plea to the wrong offense.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Overton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
224 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. BallardOhio Supreme Court· 1981-06-24· cited 893×
- Robinson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1979-07-26· cited 654×
- State v. LerouxSupreme Court of Florida· 1996-12-19· cited 196×
- Ashley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1993-02-25· cited 194×
- Peart v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2000-04-13· cited 141×
- People v. HolmesCalifornia Supreme Court· 2004-02-19· cited 118×
- Koenig v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1992-02-27· cited 80×
- Major v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2002-03-28· cited 71×
- State v. PartlowSupreme Court of Florida· 2003-02-20· cited 69×
- DeConingh v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1983-04-21· cited 68×
- Lynch v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2009-01-30· cited 62×
- State v. ReavesSupreme Court of Iowa· 1977-05-25· cited 57×
- People v. WattsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1977-02-16· cited 55×
- Leeman v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1978-04-04· cited 45×
- State v. FoxDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-09-06· cited 43×
- Holmes v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1979-04-26· cited 40×
- State v. GreenSupreme Court of Florida· 1982-10-28· cited 36×
- Garcia v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-12-02· cited 34×
- Amends. to Fl. Rules of Crim. Proc.Supreme Court of Florida· 1996-11-27· cited 34×
- Florida BarSupreme Court of Florida· 1977-02-10· cited 33×
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1969-06-02· cited 12,640×
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court· 1970-11-23· cited 9,465×
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1970-05-04· cited 7,191×
- McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court· 1970-05-04· cited 5,113×
- McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1969-04-02· cited 3,200×
- Richardson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1971-03-31· cited 927×
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. West v. RundleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1968-01-03· cited 225×
- People v. BarrowsMichigan Supreme Court· 1959-11-25· cited 166×
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1971-02-10· cited 62×
- Costello v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1972-03-01· cited 45×
- People v. BumpusMichigan Supreme Court· 1959-02-19· cited 40×
- People v. CoatesMichigan Supreme Court· 1953-06-08· cited 27×
- James B. Stinson v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1963-04-19· cited 18×
- Lyles v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1974-08-20· cited 18×
- Hall v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1974-11-13· cited 12×
- Coyle v. Port Authority Transit Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1970-03-25· cited 4×
- Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1974-12-18· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.