Skip to main content

Citations

  • 659 So. 2d 1324
  • 1995 WL 521118

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “the fact that the plea colloquy was deficient is not in itself a sufficient basis to permit withdrawal of the plea after sentencing. It is the defendant’s burden to establish prejudice or manifest injustice.”
  • concluding a trial judge is required to inform a defendant only of the direct consequences of his plea
  • finding defendant failed to demonstrate that prejudice or manifest injustice resulted from court's failure to properly determine a factual basis for the plea when defendant did not contend that he was innocent of the charged crime or that he pled guilty to the wrong offense
  • plea will not be set aside based on failure to obtain proper factual predicate absent claim of innocence or plea to wrong charge
  • a plea will not be vacated after sentencing on the basis of the violation of a rule of procedure, such as rule 3.172, unless the defendant can show prejudice or manifest injustice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jorgenson, Cope and Green

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.