Williams v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant’s time at residential drug facility was not more restrictive than the confinement of a person placed on community control, and therefore, he was not entitled to credit for time served at the facility
• defendant was not entitled to credit for time spent in residential drug treatment facility as condition of probation, as he was not in the total control and custody of the state at all times

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Toney v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-05-08· cited 12×
• Jenigen v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-11-28· cited 2×
• Dennison v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-12-05· cited 1×
• Williams v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-01-11

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Poore v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1988-09-22· cited 288×
• Tal-Mason v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1987-11-12· cited 59×
• State v. Powell
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1997-11-20· cited 45×
• Pennington v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1981-04-16· cited 39×
• Crews v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-12-06· cited 19×
• Lawton v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-03-31· cited 18×
• Hill v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-03-22· cited 7×
• Chupka v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-05-12· cited 4×
• State v. Hester
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-07-02· cited 1×