Skip to main content

Lawton v. State

Citations

  • 731 So. 2d 60
  • 1999 WL 172678

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a sentence which exceeds the suspended portion of a true split sentence is illegal
  • holding that substantive due process requires that a patently illegal sentence be corrected despite the law of the case doctrine
  • holding that twelve year sentence imposed after the defendant violated a term of supervision was fundamental error when the defendant should have only received a five year sentence
  • concluding illegal sentence was fundamental error that needed to be corrected because the result was a manifest injustice to the defendant
  • holding substantive due process requires patently illegal sentence be corrected despite the law of case doctrine
  • holding substantive due process requires patently illegal sentence be corrected despite, the law of case doctrine

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.