Skip to main content

Williams v. State

Citations

  • 643 S.W.2d 136
  • 1982 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1126

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • deciding whether the unresponsive testimony that a marriage was annulled when the defendant “got sent to the penitentiary” was reversible error
  • concluding there was no reasonable possibility that evidence of the accused’s prior incarceration affected the verdict
  • discussing a State witness’s unresponsive answer, which inadvertently placed information prejudicial to the defendant before the jury
  • noting the general rule that an instruction to disregard is sufficient to cure prejudice from a nonresponsive answer given by a State’s witness
  • where prejudicial information is inadvertently placed before a jury through a witness’s unresponsive answer, the general rule is that an instruction by the trial judge to the jury to disregard such answer is sufficient to cure harm
  • where prejudicial information is inadvertently placed before a jury through a witness's unresponsive answer, the general rule is that an instruction by the trial judge to the jury to disregard such answer is sufficient to cure harm

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Teague, Dally, Davis, Teag-Ue

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

43 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.