Skip to main content
· 4/20/2005

Bell v. Greissman

Citations

  • 902 So. 2d 846
  • 2005 WL 906266

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that new trial is required where reasonable doubt existed as to whether juror possessed requisite state of mind necessary to render impartial decision
  • close cases involving challenges to the impartiality of potential jurors should be resolved in favor of excusing the juror rather than leaving doubt as to impartiality
  • close cases involving challenges to the impartiality of potential jurors should be resolved in favor of excusing the juror rather than leaving doubt as to impartiality

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.