Skip to main content

Anderson v. State

Citations

  • 554 S.E.2d 811
  • 251 Ga. App. 785
  • 2001 Fulton County D. Rep. 3134
  • 2001 Ga. App. LEXIS 1140

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • attempts to expand enumeration of errors in reply and supplemental briefs are impermissible
  • attempts to expand enumeration of errors in reply and supplemental briefs are impermissible
  • appellate review cannot be enlarged or transformed through switching, shifting, or mending one’s hold; function of Court of Appeals is to review errors of the lower courts, not to review assertions made by appellant and brought directly to this court
  • appellate review cannot be enlarged or transformed through switching, shifting, or mending one’s hold; function of Court of Appeals is to review errors of the lower courts, not to review assertions made by appellant and brought directly to this court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Phipps, Smith, Barnes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.