Skip to main content

Scott v. State

Citations

  • 796 So. 2d 959
  • 2001 WL 423316

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying the rule that “objections must be made with specificity to preserve for appeal”
  • applying the rule that “objections must be made with specificity to preserve for appeal”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pittman, C.J., Mills and Waller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.