Skip to main content

Williams v. People

Citations

  • 55 V.I. 721
  • 2011 WL 4072738
  • 2011 V.I. Supreme LEXIS 33

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that “[w]hen providing the instructions to the jury, the trial court . . . was only required to correctly state the law . . . [and] is not obligate to use the language the defendant proffers.”
  • defining consent as the “acquiescence by a person of age or with requisite mental capacity who is not under duress or coercion”
  • defining consent as the “acquiescence by a person of age or with requisite mental capacity who is not under duress or coercion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cabret, Hodge, Swan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.