Skip to main content

Webster v. People

Citations

  • 60 V.I. 666
  • 2014 WL 879562
  • 2014 V.I. Supreme LEXIS 22

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that defendant’s “actions in waking his mother to demand the keys and later taking the vehicle without her consent do not constitute ‘a single act or omission’ for the purposes of 14 V.I.C. § 104”
  • addressing a sufficiency argument even where the appellant failed to properly raise the issue on appeal
  • holding it “plain” that an unconstitutional statute cannot be enforced
  • omitting location as an element of the crime of disturbing the peace, 14 V.I.C. § 622(1)
  • holding it “plain” that an unconstitutional statute cannot be enforced
  • holding it “plain” that an unconstitutional statute cannot be enforced

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cabret, Hodge, Swan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

45 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Webster v. People

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.