· 7/21/2006
United States v. Luis A. Flores
Citations
- 454 F.3d 149
- 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 18365
- 2006 WL 2035165
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[C]ounsel’s failure to object leaves us with the impression that the misstatement in the oral charge was hardly noticeable.”
- “So long as the court conveys the required meaning, the particular words used are irrelevant.”
- “The district court is not obligated to use the language the defendant proffers.” (quotation marks omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rendell, Ambro, Shapiro
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.