Skip to main content
· 7/21/2006

United States v. Luis A. Flores

Citations

  • 454 F.3d 149
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 18365
  • 2006 WL 2035165

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[C]ounsel’s failure to object leaves us with the impression that the misstatement in the oral charge was hardly noticeable.”
  • “So long as the court conveys the required meaning, the particular words used are irrelevant.”
  • “The district court is not obligated to use the language the defendant proffers.” (quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rendell, Ambro, Shapiro

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.