S.D. Ohio· 7/9/1984
Williams v. Lederle Laboratories
Citations
- 591 F. Supp. 381
- 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15130
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “If the defendant does not present rebutting evidence, the presumption satisfies the plaintiff’s burden of demonstrating that the inadequate warning was the proximate cause of the ingestion of the drug.”
- “What [the treating physician] might or might not have done involves to some degree his credibility. Thus, we conclude that it is for the jury to determine whether the presence of an adequate warning would have made no difference in [the physician’s] decision.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Spiegel
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Thom v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.Tenth Circuit· 2003-12-22· cited 390×
- Tracy v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court· 1991-03-27· cited 204×
- prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 13,309 Milissa Garside v. Osco Drug, Inc.First Circuit· 1992-09-30· cited 62×
- Mazur v. Merck & Co., Inc.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1990-06-29· cited 53×
- Kearl v. Lederle LaboratoriesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1985-09-27· cited 51×
- Dicie Ellen Hibley Swayze, Legal Guardian and Next Friend of Michael Wayne Swayze v. McNeil Laboratories, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1987-02-06· cited 47×
- Motus v. Pfizer Inc.C.D. California· 2001-12-20· cited 42×
- Tongate v. Wyeth LaboratoriesAppellate Court of Illinois· 1991-11-15· cited 29×
- Riley v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.Montana Supreme Court· 1993-06-22· cited 25×
- Snawder v. CohenW.D. Kentucky· 1990-04-20· cited 23×
- Harwell v. American Medical Systems, Inc.M.D. Tennessee· 1992-09-14· cited 23×
- Strumph v. Schering Corp.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1992-05-21· cited 20×
- Monroe v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.S.D. Ohio· 2014-07-10· cited 16×
- Jacobs v. Dista Products Co.D. Wyoming· 1988-09-07· cited 13×
- Samuels v. American Cyanamid Co.New York Supreme Court· 1985-11-06· cited 12×
- James L. Hurley, Jr., Etc. v. Lederle Laboratories Division of American Cyanamid Co., DefendantsFifth Circuit· 1988-08-17· cited 10×
- Polley v. Ciba-Geigy Corp.D. Alaska· 1987-02-11· cited 8×
- Percival v. American Cyanamid Co.W.D. Oklahoma· 1987-12-09· cited 5×
- Tenuto v. Lederle LaboratoriesNew York Supreme Court· 1999-06-30· cited 4×
- Myers Ex Rel. Myers v. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2007-10-05· cited 1×
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- William Butler Smith v. Leman HudsonSixth Circuit· 1979-06-21· cited 746×
- Reyes v. Wyeth LaboratoriesFifth Circuit· 1974-07-31· cited 219×
- Seley v. G. D. Searle & Co.Ohio Supreme Court· 1981-07-15· cited 209×
- In Re Atlas Concrete Pipe, Inc., Bankrupt. Atlas Concrete Pipe, Inc. v. Roger J. Au & Son, Inc.Sixth Circuit· 1982-01-18· cited 195×
- Davis v. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1968-01-22· cited 165×
- Beatrice G. Stanback v. Parke, Davis and CompanyFourth Circuit· 1981-08-27· cited 61×
- Sherry Givens and Wendel Givens, Cross v. Lederle, Etc., Cross Sherry Givens and Wendel Givens v. Lederle, Etc.Fifth Circuit· 1977-08-08· cited 41×
- Goodson v. Searle LaboratoriesD. Connecticut· 1978-10-23· cited 41×
- Dunkin v. Syntex Laboratories, Inc.W.D. Tennessee· 1977-10-14· cited 40×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.