Skip to main content
· 10/23/1978

Goodson v. Searle Laboratories

Citations

  • 471 F. Supp. 546
  • 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14778

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that defendant drug manufacturer was entitled to summary judgment in light of evidence of warnings which the defendant gave the medical profession and the plaintiffs prescribing doctor concerning the risk at issue in the case
  • “[T]he drug can be used only under the professional supervision of a doctor licensed by law to administer the drug.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ellen B. Burns

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.