S.D. New York· 7/28/2000

Williams v. Goord

Citations

111 F. Supp. 2d 280
2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10601
2000 WL 1051874

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“SHU confinement in New York generally does not impose ‘atypical and significant hardship’ because it remains within the normal range of prison custody.”
75 days in solitary confinement “generally does not impose an atypical and significant hardship because it remains within the normal range of prison custody”
“Although the temporal proximity of the filing of the grievance and the issuance of the misbehavior report is circumstantial evidence of retaliation, such evidence, without more, is insufficient to survive summary judgment.”
75-day confinement was not “onerous” or an “atypical and significant” burden under Sandin
“In recognition of the reality that retaliation claims can be fabricated easily, plaintiffs bear a somewhat heightened burden of proof, and summary judgment can be granted if the claim appears insubstantial.”
90 days in administrative segregation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Scheindlin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.