Williams v. Citibank, N.A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiffs’ NYGBL claims when the FDCPA claims had been dismissed
• granting motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim where complaint under FDCPA failed to allege that entity “collects debts for other, unrelated entities or that its principal business is debt collection”
• interpreting pro se plaintiff’s complaint as asserting only causes of action on his own behalf in light of the prohibition on pro se plaintiffs representing the interests of third parties
• “The court need not accept as true an allegation that is contradicted by documents on which the complaint relies.”
• “The court need not accept as true an allegation that is contradicted by documents on which the complaint relies.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).